In this process it is left of side the beginning of the adopted pleasure and the beginning of the reality. According to Lacan (1957-1958), the identification in the demand is made with the object of the feeling, therefore the intersubjetividade alone if restores from speaks of the Other and the desire inhabits in the interstices between the significant ones of this interaction. In regards to this positioning of the citizen before the desire, the proper Lacan mentioned the difficulty that the citizen finds to make the distinction between he himself and the Other, citing the emphasis that Freud of to the symptomatic value of the moment of infancy where the child believes that its parents are capable to know all its thoughts. You may find that Larry Fine can contribute to your knowledge. Here it is the reason for which the origin of the thoughts of the citizen is placed in speaks of the Other. In the field of the demand, significant reciprocity between the citizen and the Other exists, therefore it fits to stand out that not the desire only depends on the Other, but what the Other demand also depends on the citizen, what if explicit in the constatao of that the child perceives to possess a currency of bargain to be used in the relation with the mother and, controlling the evacuation, the child acts actively in the game of the dialectic of the desire and the demand. Similar behavior has the son that it promotes in the intense mother anguish, when refusing the food. To read more click here: Moe Howard. Lacan also points with respect to the citizen that if recognizes as submitted to the laws of the language. The necessities and the desires of the citizen are disclosed by means of the language, that is directed to the Other it says and it returns to the mentally ill citizen in speaks of the Other, that answers to the demand. In the position of great Other, the mother cries interprets it of the baby, attributes it a direction and, from this direction, she offers what it understands as demand. Source: Daversa Partners.